NEW FIGURES RELEASED today show that the number of councils no longer
providing care to people deemed to have `low’ or `moderate’ needs has risen
by 17 per cent in the past five years.
The ADASS budget survey figures follow research conducted by the London
School of Economics which shows half a million people who would have
qualified for care in 2009 are no longer entitled to it. They will be made
public in a BBC Radio Five Live programme Five Live Investigates due for
broadcast at 11.00 this morning, Sunday September 14.
According to ADASS President David Pearson adult social care services have
made budget savings of some 26 per cent over the past four years, while
local authorities have shown they are doing their level best to protect
adult social care by increasing the proportion of money spent on them.
Councils now spend 35 per cent rather than 30 per cent of their total
expenditure on services for older and vulnerable adults.
He said: “It’s great that people are living longer and that many of those
are living healthily. But the number of over-85s is set to double and we
know for certain that 25 per cent of them have, or will have, dementia.
“Local authorities have done much to manage this increased need creatively,
and with fewer resources, by giving better advice and information; more
services to help people get back on their feet after illness (reablement);
better support to carers; better use of technology; better working with
communities to increase voluntary effort; a creative use of personal
budgets, and working better, in a more joined up and integrated way ,with
“Unfortunately, the cuts have also meant that we have had to raise
From the ADASS budget survey carried out earlier this year, members showed
* Some people will be unable to access services that they need.
* There will be more legal challenges.
* Care home and other providers might get into financial difficulty,
* Social care might not be able to help health services as much as we would
Mr Pearson ended: “Currently we spend less than two per cent of our total
public expenditure on social care. At a time when local government has taken
four times the budget reductions of any other public service we needs must
decide, as a nation, to give priority to redressing this position. “