Independent Commission Calls For A New Settlement For Health And Social Care
The health and social care systems are no longer fit for purpose, an independent commission established by The King’s Fund has concluded. The time has come, it says, for ‘a new settlement’ to meet the needs of 21st century patients and service users.
The interim report from the five-strong commission, chaired by Kate Barker, says that England should move towards a single, ring-fenced budget for health and social care, with services singly commissioned and entitlements more closely aligned. With the NHS and social care now under significant financial strain, the report presents hard choices about how to pay for fairer entitlements and ensure adequate funding to meet future needs.
The independent commission was set up by The King’s Fund to re-examine the post-war settlement, which established separate systems for health and social care. In its interim report, the commission concludes that the current settlement is failing to respond to the needs of the increasing number of people with long-term conditions, young as well as old. It argues that a lack of alignment in entitlements, funding and organisation between the two systems results in unfairness, poorly co-ordinated services and confusion for patients, service users and their families.
- With health care largely free at the point of use and social care needs-based and heavily means-tested, entitlements vary, so that people with different conditions – cancer and dementia, for example – end up making very different contributions to the cost of their care.
- The lack of alignment in funding, with the NHS paid for out of general taxation and a budget that has been ring-fenced for a number of years, and social care reliant on grant funding that has been subject to significant cuts, has led to social care becoming an increasingly residual service.
- With health care delivered through the NHS and social care overseen by local authorities, the lack of alignment in organisation between the two systems creates confusion for patients, service users and their families, and acts as a significant barrier to improving the co-ordination services.
On top of this, the commission concludes that funding is inadequate, with insufficient public money currently spent on social care, and more resources needed to meet future health and care needs as the population ages. This raises questions of affordability and the need to make difficult choices about how to meet these costs, including the balance between public and private funding, which the commission will address in its final report in the autumn.
The commission’s chair, Kate Barker, said: ‘The current systems rub up against each other like bones in an open fracture. The lack of alignment between them leads to serious problems of co-ordination, with the NHS and local authorities battling over who should pay for what, and patients, service users and their families left confused and bewildered. This is not sustainable – we need a new settlement fit for the 21st century.
‘This report is our stake in the ground. The prize we seek – a single, seamless health and social care system that offers equal support for equal need – is a significant one. This necessitates making choices about how to pay for a better system – hard choices that we must look squarely in the eye.’
Responding to the report, Chris Ham, Chief Executive of The King’s Fund said: ‘We welcome the commission’s report – it sets out a compelling case for change and hard choices that need to be faced. These choices present a significant challenge to politicians but with NHS and social care budgets now under huge strain, this is a debate we need to start before, not after, the next general election.’
The interim report outlines a number of options for funding increased health and social care spending and the criteria against which the commission will judge them. The commission will now seek views on these options and undertake further work on costings, before it publishes its final report in the autumn.
